Comparison between intermittent mandatory and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure in children

Comparison between intermittent mandatory ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure support in children.

OBJECTIVE To compare intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus pressure support (SIMV+PS) in terms of time on mechanical ventilation, duration of weaning and length of stay in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). METHODS This was a randomized clinical trial that enrolled children aged 28 days to 4 years who were admitted to a PICU be...

Comparison between intermittent mandatory and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure in children.

Mechanical ventilation can be life saving in critically ill infants and children, but has important complications. As a consequence, newmodesofmechanical ventilationhavebeen introduced in an attempt to reduce baro/volutrauma. The modes include thosewhich avoid intubation, such as continuouspositive airwayspressure (CPAP),minimize excessive volumes, i.e., volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) and hi...

[Intermittent mandatory ventilation--I.M.V].

Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with and without pressure support ventilation in weaning patients with COPD from mechanical ventilation.

This prospective study compared two weaning modalities in COPD patients requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) for acute respiratory failure. Nineteen patients with COPD were studied when their precipitating illness was controlled. Although they satisfied the conventional bedside weaning criteria, they could not tolerate any reduction in the respirator rate below 10 cycles/min. At this time, pat...

Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation: What's in a Name?

Hence, there is a need for the ventilator, in general, to provide for both spontaneous and mandatory breaths on an intermittent basis. This was the motivation for inventing IMV in the first place, as Kacmarek and Branson mentioned in their paper.1 How does recognition of only type 1 IMV (as in the article by Kacmarek and Branson1) impair our understanding of modes? There are only 3 basic goals ...